|
Court
rules against gaming compact
May
3, 2002
By R. PATRICK CORBETT
Observer-Dispatch
ALBANY—
The New York state Legislature must approve Indian gaming
compacts negotiated between a tribe and the governor, a
state appeals court said Thursday.
The Appellate Division of state Supreme Court in Albany
ruled 5-0 that the deal former Gov. Mario Cuomo cut with
the Mohawk Indians for a Northern New York casino in 1993
is invalid.
Gov. George Pataki will appeal the decision, his spokesperson
Suzanne Morris said Thursday.
In a similar case, State Supreme Court Justice James McCarthy
recently concluded hearings on a challenge to the compact
between Cuomo and the Oneida Indian Nation of New York for
the Turning Stone Casino in Verona.
Utica lawyer Leon Koziol, who represents the Upstate Citizens
for Equality in the local case, said he is encouraged by
Thursday’s decision. “The logic ... is the state Legislature
... is the body that should be negotiating gaming compacts,”
he said.
While McCarthy may give the decision weight in his ruling,
Koziol said, his court is not in the Albany district, so
he is not bound by Thursday’s decision.
Morris said, “We don’t see any immediate implications,”
either for the Oneida case or for the six new Indian casinos
authorized by the Legislature last fall.
Oneida Nation spokesman Mark Emery agreed. He said Thursday
that the Albany decision does not apply to the Turning Stone
compact, also approved by Cuomo in 1993.
He added that Nation leaders believe that Thursday’s ruling
“misapplies federal law as it relates to Indian gaming.”
The appellate judges said that those who challenged the
Mohawk compact, including the Saratoga County Chamber of
Commerce and an evangelical Christian group, “do not seek
to shut down the tribe’s casino,” although they do want
to prevent its expansion.
Koziol said the landowners group he represents wants the
court to order the state to renegotiate the Oneida Nation
compact to force the tribe to pay local governments for
services that benefit the casino.
The Oneidas say they are exempt from taxes on tribal lands
and do not pay local property taxes. They do offer, however,
voluntary payments to local schools to offset any lost taxes.
|